| Passage: Daniel 7-9 On Thursday, September 26, 2013, Yujin wrote,
What an awesome epithet! To be highly esteemed by the LORD! This was said of the prophet Daniel because he was faithful and humble. He did not compromise his obedience to the Lord, even under threat of death. He did not parade his knowledge and authority but humbled himself before God and the human authorities that God had ordained to rule. He did not forget his national identity as an Israelite in a foreign land, but identified with them in their sin and judgment and prayed for their deliverance in keeping with God's Name and promises. Consequently, while living in Babylon, he proved himself responsible, reliable, and excellent in every way. And he did not fail to give sincere counsel and witness to the foreign leaders, that they should submit to the only true God. Friends, let us consider the example of Daniel, for in a sense we too are in a foreign land with godless leaders. Our citizenship is in heaven, as is our hope. Let us prove ourselves to be reliable, responsible, and excellent in every way while living in this world. Let us not fail to use the platform that God has given us to provide sincere counsel and witness of the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. What is more, let us not bicker among ourselves, like the worldly do. Let us not be so easily offended or give offense, for all the trappings of this world will soon pass away. Instead, let us give our attention to knowing God's will through His Word and upholding the primacy of God's truth over every opinion, experience, interest, or pursuit. There is nothing more central to our witness! Daniel confessed the sin of his people and the judgment they were experiencing in this way:
They failed to give attention to God's truth! Let us not be found to have a similar failing. AI-Expanded Reflection Daniel 9 begins with reading before it moves to praying. Daniel attends to Jeremiah’s prophecy concerning Jerusalem’s desolation and responds with confession and petition (Daniel 9:1–3). A promise does not make prayer unnecessary; it gives prayer its direction. This relationship matters because assurance of God’s sovereignty can otherwise be mistaken for a reason to remain passive. Daniel’s confidence in God’s word draws him into active dependence. The address in Daniel 9:23 is translated as highly esteemed, greatly beloved, or precious. The Hebrew expression belongs to a word family associated with what is desired or treasured; it communicates valued standing, not a technical award for exceptional performance. The Hebrew lexical entry also shows its use for desirable things. Context determines the personal force here. Daniel receives reassurance that he is heard and valued while seeking understanding, not a declaration that his prayer has earned God’s affection. Daniel’s conduct certainly displays faithfulness, and the original rightly connects his public service with his devotion. Yet Daniel 9:18 explicitly appeals to God’s great mercy rather than Israel’s righteousness. The prayer includes repeated “we” language: the faithful petitioner identifies with his people’s covenant failure instead of using their guilt to display his superiority. Such solidarity does not mean confessing a deed he personally did not commit as though he had. It means acknowledging membership in a community whose shared history and institutions stand in need of mercy. The prayer also joins repentance to attention. Daniel 9:13 names failure to turn from iniquity and failure to attend to God’s truth together. Biblical learning is therefore more than accumulating explanations of prophecy. Knowledge that leaves allegiance and conduct untouched misses the purpose of understanding. Conversely, energetic activism that refuses patient attention to Scripture may simply reproduce the community’s existing assumptions with greater confidence. The analogy with believers living as citizens of heaven is fruitful when kept proportionate. Daniel serves within a particular exilic and imperial setting; Christians live under many kinds of governments, some more just than others. Heavenly citizenship does not require contempt for neighbors or withdrawal from ordinary civic responsibilities (Philippians 3:20; Jeremiah 29:7). It relativizes every earthly authority while encouraging honest, competent service. Daniel’s refusal of idolatry exists alongside his willingness to contribute to public administration. One practical mark of this posture is the ability to disagree without treating every personal slight as a spiritual emergency. Another is willingness to confess corporate failure without abandoning hope for the community. The believer’s worth is not created by winning an argument, maintaining influence, or appearing untroubled. Daniel is addressed as treasured while humbled in prayer. From that secure dependence can grow the reliability and courage the original commends: careful work, truthful counsel, repentance when needed, and an identity received from God rather than manufactured through success. | ||
| Passage: Daniel 7-9 On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 (Last Updated on 9/26/2013), Yujin wrote,
Daniel is considered by God to be among the most righteous (Ezekiel 14:14; Daniel 10:11), yet here he is identifying himself with the sinful people of Israel and profusely confessing their sins. It reminds me of Isaiah's confession, "I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips" (Isaiah 6:5). I don't know of any passage in Scripture that compares with the above passage, where there is such a repeated and pronounced confession of sin. As I read it, I am humiliated. Daniel's contemporary, Ezekiel, wrote God's words:
Daniel is that man, and here he is doing the very thing God desires. He is interceding on behalf of God's people and on behalf of Jerusalem. Even though he could not stay God's hand in destroying Jerusalem, he is claiming the promise that God made through Jeremiah, namely, that God would restore His people to their land within seventy years’ time (Daniel 9:2; Jeremiah 29:10). But he does not claim the promise by making demands of God but by confessing the very sins that caused the destruction in the first place, for this is in keeping with God's will. His prayer does not change the prophetic promise, nor would it hinder it, but it gives expression to the attitude that God desires and what would keep Jerusalem from being destroyed again. Friends, let us remember to intercede for the church spread throughout the world. As Paul wrote, "If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it" (1 Corinthians 12:26 NIV). He spoke of the interconnectedness of the church. And our concerns should not merely be with external challenges to the church but even more to the need for internal holiness. As was true of Israel, so we might also say of the church. Our greatest enemy is not outside of us but within us, even within our own hearts in the measure and sincerity of our devotion to Him. Like Daniel, we ought to profusely confess our sins and admit our unrighteousness. And as we do, we ought also to make our appeal to God's grace and God's help for the sake of His Name:
Notice, just as Daniel repeatedly confessed their sins, he repeatedly acknowledged that the deliverance he sought was not because they were righteous but because of God's Name, even His reputation for being merciful and fulfilling His promises to His people. As Daniel, so let us acknowledge and declare that God has saved us by His great grace, and let us seek God's favor in our day in keeping with that same grace, humbly and sincerely confessing our sinfulness as a people. AI-Expanded Reflection Daniel’s prayer begins with Scripture and moves into confession. Reading Jeremiah’s promise does not lead him to passive calculation or to a demand that God meet a deadline. It leads him to seek the Lord with fasting and prayer (Daniel 9:2–3). Promise and petition belong together: confidence in what God has said gives Daniel reason to pray, while prayer forms the humble response appropriate to that promise. He does not place his righteousness alongside God’s faithfulness as a second basis for restoration. The repeated “we” is central. Daniel does not need to pretend that he personally committed every offense in Israel’s history in order to identify with the covenant community. He belongs to this people, shares its grief, and acknowledges the justice of God’s judgment upon it. Corporate confession therefore differs from indiscriminately assigning identical personal guilt. It expresses solidarity and responsibility without erasing the distinctions between perpetrators, victims, and those who resisted wrongdoing. A congregation confessing institutional failure should similarly name actual wrongs rather than use collective language to conceal who must repent or make restitution. The prayer’s structure keeps confession from becoming hopeless self-accusation. Daniel repeatedly contrasts human rebellion with God’s righteousness, mercy, and saving action. The memory of the exodus supplies a precedent for appealing to the Lord who has already made his name known through deliverance. The climax rests openly on mercy rather than deservingness (9:18). Honest confession does not require us to persuade God that we are worthless; it requires us to abandon excuses and entrust ourselves to the character he has revealed. The comparison with Ezekiel’s missing intercessor is a meaningful thematic connection, but Daniel’s prayer should not be made a direct historical reversal of Ezekiel 22:30. The contexts differ, and Ezekiel 14 itself emphasizes that even exemplary righteous people cannot simply transfer their righteousness to rescue a persistently rebellious community. Daniel seeks restoration through mercy, not through a spiritual surplus of his own. This distinction prepares Christian readers to appreciate the unique mediation of Christ without confusing it with even the most faithful human intercession. The call to pray for the wider church becomes concrete when we include its holiness as well as its protection. We may ask God to sustain persecuted believers, expose concealed abuse, correct false teaching, and restore those who have wandered. Such prayer refuses both defensive loyalty that denies sin and detached criticism that refuses belonging. Daniel teaches us to stand with God’s people before God, confessing truthfully and appealing hopefully to the mercy on which we all depend. | ||
| Passage: Daniel 7-9 On Monday, September 26, 2011, Yujin wrote, Chapter nine of Daniel contains, more than any other, the book's most notable prophecies, concerning both the coming Messiah and the time of the end. Without careful attention to its chronological references (like the "seventy weeks"), its historical context, and related prophetic pointers elsewhere in Scripture, these prophecies can be genuinely difficult to follow. But the time invested in studying them carefully is well rewarded — both in understanding and in a deepened appreciation for God's sovereignty over all of history, past and future alike. For anyone wanting to dig deeper, Fred G. Zaspel has written a helpful online commentary on Daniel's seventy weeks worth reading. AI-Expanded Reflection The difficulty this comment names in Daniel 9 is worth putting in perspective: this chapter has generated more detailed scholarly and denominational disagreement over precise chronology than almost any other prophetic passage in Scripture, with careful, faithful interpreters landing on meaningfully different calculations and conclusions about what the "seventy weeks" actually describe and when they're fulfilled. That level of ongoing disagreement among serious readers is worth knowing going in — not as a reason to avoid the study this comment encourages, but as a reasonable expectation that full certainty on every specific detail may not be available, even after careful work, while the chapter's larger claim (God's sovereign control over the sweep of history, including its end) remains clear regardless of how the details get resolved. | ||