| Passage: 1 Peter 1-5 On Tuesday, December 31, 2013, Yujin wrote, In your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame (a paraphrase of 1 Peter 3:15–16). There is only one imperative (command) in these verses. The other verbal forms modify and explain it. The command is this: "In your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy." How to do this is explained by the modifying words:
A famous saying attributed to Francis of Assisi goes, "Preach the gospel always, and if necessary, use words." Perhaps this passage was in mind when these words were spoken. The shortcoming of the saying is its assumption that the Gospel could ever be preached by a godly example alone, without words. This passage does not teach that a godly life replaces the preaching of the Gospel, but that it supports the preaching of the Gospel, because an ungodly life would certainly hinder it. If you think you only need to honor Christ in your behavior and not in your speech, you are badly mistaken. Both are necessary — and speech even more so, if people are to hear, understand, and be saved. Even among other Christians we are to both speak and serve. As Peter writes, each should use the gift he has received to serve one another, as good stewards of God's varied grace: whoever speaks, as one who speaks the oracles of God; whoever serves, as one who serves by the strength God supplies — so that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ, to whom belong glory and dominion forever (a paraphrase of 1 Peter 4:10–11). God must be glorified both in our speech and in our service. When we set Christ apart as Lord in our hearts, His lordship will be seen in both our speech and our behavior, in our spoken testimony as well as our godly conduct. Friends, as we thank God for another year He has graciously given us and look forward to a new year, let us renew our commitment to honor Christ as Lord in our hearts. Let us renew our dedication to testify of our eternal hope in Christ while living blameless and humble lives, so that there is no basis for any accusation of hypocrisy. AI-Expanded Reflection 1 Peter 3:15 is the classic text for Christian apologetics — the Greek word for "defense" is apologia, the term for a legal defense in court. But it is striking how Peter frames it. The readiness to give a reason comes after "honor Christ the Lord as holy" in the heart, and it is qualified by "gentleness and respect." Christian defense of the faith, in Peter's vision, flows from worship and is marked by humility toward the questioner. The verse also assumes that believers' lives will prompt questions: people ask about "the hope that is in you" because they see it. Peter's setting makes this more remarkable. He was writing to believers scattered across Asia Minor who faced slander and social hostility (2:12; 4:4, 12–16). His counsel was neither withdrawal nor retaliation, but good conduct and ready, gracious witness. The comment's point that deeds and words belong together is exactly Peter's: keep your conduct honorable, so that those who slander you "may see your good deeds and glorify God" (2:12), while also being ready to speak. | ||
| Passage: 1 Peter 1-5 On Monday, December 31, 2012 (Last Updated on 12/30/2020), Yujin wrote,
Here's Peter's interpretation and application of Jesus' Sermon on the Mount teaching, "Turn the other cheek":
This teaching is so contrary to our normal sense of justice for ourselves and for others. We don't want to turn the other cheek. We want to get even. We don't want to return blessing for harm. We want to harm more and hit harder. A vengeful justice is in our DNA, but Jesus commands us to go against that natural propensity and do just the opposite. But how? Peter answers, "Conscious of God" (1 Peter 2:19). How did Christ do it? "He entrusted himself to Him who judges justly" (1 Peter 2:23). Friends, when we feel slighted by an AT&T Customer Service Agent, when we feel that construction workers are cutting corners in building our new house, when we feel our waiter giving us attitude or poor service, we want justice! To us, that justice means belittling and criticizing the AT&T agent until we get a Supervisor on the line who will give us what we want. That justice means threatening to renege on our construction contract because the workers are not building to the standard we expect. That justice means refusing to tip the unpleasant waitress. I know some of you may disagree with me here, but may I suggest that when we do things like this, we are not "committing ourselves to our faithful Creator and doing good" (1 Peter 4:19). We are not following in the footsteps of Christ, who did not retaliate when insulted and made no threats when caused to suffer (1 Peter 2:23). We may argue that we are ensuring future justice for others, but God has not called us to correct the world system. He has called us instead to set an example of good amidst suffering. Peter writes,
We are called to be salt and light to the world (Matthew 5:13–16). This does not mean that we force the world to become some kind of theocracy, but rather that we be an example of what is good and pure and holy, so that the unbelieving world will praise the God whom we serve:
Therefore, friends, the next time you are frustrated with your service provider, your waiter, your construction worker, your landlord, your boss, or whoever else you may encounter in this life, I hope that you will respond with an attitude that is "conscious of God," knowing that we are "foreigners and exiles" here, and that this is not our final home. AI-Expanded Reflection First Peter’s account of unjust suffering locates Christian endurance in Christ’s own response. He does not answer insult with insult or make threats; he entrusts himself to the One who judges justly. This is not a declaration that injustice has become harmless. The appeal to a just Judge assumes precisely the opposite. The wrong matters, but personal vengeance is not the instrument by which the sufferer must secure the final verdict. Trust opens a space between being injured and deciding to injure in return. The immediate setting includes household servants subject to harsh masters (1 Peter 2:18–20). That unequal relationship should remain visible when applying the passage to less severe frustrations. Peter addresses people whose ability to change their circumstances may be very limited and affirms the significance of their faithfulness before God. The passage must not be turned into a command addressed to the powerful that they may preserve an abusive arrangement by demanding the victim’s silence. The suffering servant’s dignity and allegiance to God remain central. The everyday examples in the original expose how quickly disappointment can become a desire to humiliate. A complaint about poor service may be legitimate while the manner of pursuing it is cruel. Wanting a problem corrected differs from wanting the person responsible to feel small. Jesus’ teaching about retaliation and Peter’s description of Christ together challenge that inward escalation. We can ask whether our words seek truth and repair or whether anger has made another person’s discomfort part of the desired compensation. Nonretaliation does not, however, forbid every complaint, appeal, or effort to protect others. Jesus questions the injustice of being struck in John 18:23, and Paul invokes his rights in Acts 16:37–39. These examples prevent a blanket equation of seeking accountability with refusing to trust God. Reporting a dangerous practice, insisting on honest work, or helping someone escape mistreatment can express love of neighbor. The distinction concerns both the aim and the means: truthful action for protection and repair is different from personal revenge. The call to be conscious of God therefore shapes conduct without eliminating judgment. Before responding, we can name the actual wrong, distinguish facts from assumptions, and consider what response will serve good. Sometimes that means overlooking an irritation; sometimes it means a calm, firm request; sometimes it means involving appropriate assistance. In each case, contempt and vindictiveness remain unnecessary. Christ’s example gives strength to endure what cannot immediately be repaired and courage to do good where action is possible. The final outcome rests with the just Judge, freeing us to seek what is right without becoming like the wrong we oppose. | ||
| Passage: 1 Peter 1-5 On Saturday, December 31, 2011 (Last Updated on 12/31/2013), Yujin wrote, Friends, New Year's Eve, and I pray that those in the Word would remain in the Word. Don't let special days, seasons, or other traditions of men deter you from what is timelessly good and right for you. But remain faithful. And if at any time you are unfaithful, at the moment you realize it, be faithful again. This is the Christian life. Have you considered 1 Peter 1:1–2? As Jesus and Paul, so also Peter argues strongly for eternal election in salvation. He calls his believing audience those "elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father." We have shown previously that God's foreknowledge implies God's foreordination (i.e. predestination), so I will not rehash that analysis here. Peter only affirms here what has been affirmed throughout the Scriptures, that God saves by His sovereign choice. AI-Expanded Reflection First Peter opens by describing its recipients through the coordinated work of Father, Spirit, and Jesus Christ. They are elect according to the Father's foreknowledge, in the Spirit's sanctifying work, for obedience and the sprinkling of Christ's blood. Election is therefore not introduced as an isolated puzzle about causation. It names the gracious relationship that gives displaced and pressured believers their identity. Before Peter tells them how to endure, he tells them whose they are. Read 1 Peter 1:1–2. The original reads foreknowledge as God's prior determination rather than merely advance awareness of human belief. This is a major Reformed interpretation. Other Christians understand the relation between foreknowledge, election, and faith differently. The word alone does not settle every part of that debate. Peter's application is firmer than our ability to infer a complete philosophical account from his greeting: the readers' belonging is grounded in God's initiative and expressed in a life set apart to him. The sprinkling language invites comparison with covenant ratification in Exodus 24, where the people pledge obedience and are sprinkled with blood. In Peter's greeting, Christ's blood establishes the decisive relationship. Obedience belongs to the purpose of election, so confidence in God's choice cannot coherently become indifference to conduct. The identity that comforts believers also places their lives under Christ's claim. The New Year's exhortation gains depth from this setting. Remaining in the Word is more than maintaining a streak through holidays and distractions. It is repeatedly hearing the account of God's gracious claim when surrounding voices make belonging feel uncertain. A settled identity can sustain daily habits without turning those habits into the basis on which God chooses or accepts a person. | ||
| Passage: 1 Peter 1-5 On Friday, December 31, 2010 (Last Updated on 12/31/2012), Yujin wrote, Friends, I want to encourage you to visit our new Daily QT website. If you're receiving this, you're already registered and just need to log in; if you've forgotten your password, there's an option to have it emailed to you. This site was designed to help you, and every believer God allows me to reach, build the most valuable discipline of all — daily Bible reading. May we be like newborn infants, craving the pure spiritual milk of the word, so that through it we may grow up into our salvation (a paraphrase of 1 Peter 2:2). I'd encourage you to actively use the site and invite others to do the same. It follows our annual Bible reading schedule, which begins a new cycle on January 10. Since the site just launched, I'd appreciate any feedback you're willing to give. A brief word on today's reading — what a wonderful book, 1 Peter, to close out the year and welcome in the new one! Consider these few words of counsel: 1. Bless God for the living, eternal, heavenly hope of salvation He's given you. Peter blesses the God and Father of Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through Christ's resurrection from the dead — an imperishable, undefiled inheritance that will never fade, kept in heaven for us, who are shielded by God's power through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time (a paraphrase of 1 Peter 1:3–5). 2. Resolve, trusting entirely in God's grace, to make every effort toward holy obedience to Christ. Peter urges his readers to prepare their minds for action, stay sober-minded, and set their hope fully on the grace to be given them when Christ is revealed — living as obedient children, no longer shaped by their former ignorant desires, but holy in all their conduct, since God Himself, who called them, is holy, just as it's written, "be holy, for I am holy" (a paraphrase of 1 Peter 1:13–16). 3. Use the opportunities God's grace gives you to serve one another and honor His name. Each believer should use whatever gift they've received to serve others, as faithful stewards of God's varied grace — whoever speaks should speak as one relaying God's very words; whoever serves should serve by the strength God supplies — so that in everything, God may be praised through Jesus Christ, to whom belongs the glory and power forever (a paraphrase of 1 Peter 4:10–11). AI-Expanded Reflection The three-part structure Yujin outlines here — thanksgiving for hope, resolve toward holiness, and service to others — actually mirrors the letter's own overall shape remarkably well, since 1 Peter moves from establishing believers' secure hope (chapter 1), to their call to holy conduct (chapters 1–2), to their practical relationships and service within the community (chapters 2–5). This isn't a random selection of encouraging verses pulled from throughout the book; it traces the letter's actual argument from beginning to end, which may be part of why it works so well as a year-end summary of 1 Peter's central message. | ||